Define and implement rules to control physical and logical access to information and information assets based on business and security requirements.
Also written as A5.15, Annex A 5.15, ISO 27001:2022 A.5.15, ISO27001 A.5.15.
Access control is one of 37 Organisational Controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A. Define and implement rules to control physical and logical access to information and information assets based on business and security requirements. Organisational controls are judged on governance rather than tooling: an auditor wants a named owner, an approval trail, and evidence the control is exercised on a defined cadence rather than written once and filed.
When preparing your Statement of Applicability (SoA) for A.5.15, gather artefacts such as:
What actually gets raised against A.5.15, in rough order of how often it comes up:
A.5.15 applies wherever there is information to protect, which is universally. It is closely coupled to A.5.16, A.5.17 and A.5.18 — auditors frequently test all four together by tracing a single joiner and a single leaver end to end, so build the evidence as one story rather than four.
If you run more than one framework, the same evidence usually satisfies all of them. A.5.15 aligns with:
SOC 2: CC6.1 Logical access security architecture, CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege
NIST CSF 2.0: PR.AA-05 Access authorization and least privilege
A.5.15 consolidates the following ISO 27001:2013 control(s): A.9.1.1, A.9.1.2. If you are transitioning an existing ISMS, map your prior evidence for these to A.5.15 in your updated SoA.
See all 37 Organisational Controls →
Annex A controls are not mandatory in the abstract. Clause 6.1.3 requires you to compare your risk treatment plan against Annex A and justify, in the Statement of Applicability, any control you exclude. If your risk assessment surfaces a risk that A.5.15 addresses, excluding it needs a documented, risk-based rationale that an auditor will test.
In two passes. First design: does a documented control exist, is it owned, and does it address the risk? Then operating effectiveness: the auditor samples records from across the audit period to confirm the control actually ran. A Stage 2 audit will typically pull several samples, so evidence that only exists for the month before the audit is a common finding.
ISO 27001 sets no fixed interval — it requires review at "planned intervals" and after significant change. Annual review is the norm most certification bodies expect, with an out-of-cycle review triggered by incidents, major system changes, restructures, or new regulatory obligations. Record the review date and outcome either way; an undated control is treated as unreviewed.
A.5.15 aligns with SOC 2 CC6.1, CC6.3 and NIST CSF PR.AA-05. Evidence gathered for one framework will usually satisfy the others, which is the basis for a test-once, satisfy-many control library.
A.5.15 consolidates 2 control(s) from the 2013 edition: A.9.1.1, A.9.1.2. When transitioning, re-point the existing evidence rather than rebuilding it — the underlying requirement has not changed materially.
An access control policy that documents current state rather than intended rules, so nothing can ever be found non-compliant against it. Access reviews performed but with no evidence of anything being revoked, which suggests a rubber-stamp exercise.